UN Spiritual Summit
Note that the United Nations already has
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (but note
that I take the "other status" of Article 2 to include
sexual orientation, i.e. sexual orientation is a form of "other status",
as well as transgendered status and multi-spirit, many of whom identify as non-binary, status).
I think there should be a UN-sponsored global spiritual summit,
which I once said could be linked
some to a similar political summit, which should include first nations (aboriginal) representation, and a Beothuk wake
WOMAD festival and an environmental summit. Such
a spiritual summit would include
representatives of all spiritual paths and atheism
and agnosticism and humanism. Small spiritual paths
could have an umbrella council
with representatives from each which would choose a
representative (not leader, representative)
who would represent them at the main summit. This spiritual
summit would advise the political summit somewhat,
but the political summit would set out minimum
global law standards that individuals and groups including
religious organizations worldwide would have to meet.
I guess
penalties for not meeting them could be loss of tax
free status for the religious organization in some or
most or all jurisdictions, and of course
if they are breaking the law the leader(s) could
be charged. Such standards would incorporate
updated international human
(including women's) rights and environmental standards and animal
rights standards and would require tolerance of other paths also
meeting the standards. But beyond such minimum standards
(which many paths already exceed in theory at least) there would be
lots of loving diversity, many petals on the rose. My suggestions
so far (and you can think of your own) for agenda items for such a
political summit are below, and are largely derived by me from
the messages on main messages,
which also could be considered by the political summit
somewhat and the spiritual summit some more, I hope, but
I cannot enforce that.
The messages below are also among my essential messages.
There is some duplication
within this page and between this and the
main messages page.
- no form of blood sacrifice including of humans and of
non-humans. This message
against blood sacrifice extends to any, if any, forms of
food offerings that do constitute a thinly-veiled
form of time-delayed (no magickal/spiritual intent at
time of slaughter but added later, but effectively
time-delayed blood sacrifice) blood
sacrifice and perhaps not all forms of food offerings
do (maybe none do). Similarly, if ritual slaughter, e.g. Jewish
ritual slaughter, is a thinly-veiled form of blood
sacrifice I am against that, but I do not know all
the details of that so do not know if it is a
thinly veiled form of blood sacrifice or not. It also
should be discussed whether Christian communion is a
time-delayed veiled form of blood sacrifice.
- no clitorectomy (or clitoridectomy, however it is spelled)
- no discrimination against women, children, or men (but e.g. it
should be acceptable to have same sex sweat lodges, if there
are ones for the other gender too and the majority in the path
agree with such practice; or even acceptable to have a same
sex religious organization such as Dianic Wicca,
as long as there is an allied parallel group for
the other gender, and the majority of those in
the two dual male and female groups agree with
the practice); and ordination of both
genders must be possible at all levels (that does not mean
that in a religion with one leader that
there must be suddenly both a male and female
leader, though that could be considered, but
that the leader spot would become open to
both genders if it is not already)
in paths that include
both genders. Even if you believe your Deity
to be male that does not mean human males have to be
supreme over human females.
-
related to the above, there should be choice of
dress for people including women though I think
given that choice many would still choose
traditional garb but should not be forced to.
-
no use of religious symbols as symbols of violence (so
effectively as if large gang symbols). The exception
is if you are being attacked and may draw on
them for strength and courage in resistance,
but resistance does not mean terrorism against
innocent civilians.
If they are religious symbols they should be
symbols of peace and dialogue, else they are not
religious symbols that should be respected by governments.
-
The military must not be
worshipped/glorified but viewed as a necessary (for now)
evil though those who have served
honourably and necessarily should be respected.
Ideally nations would cease to have their own
military infrastructure (swords into plowshares,
and personnel and equipment could move ino environmental and
humanitarian and space program work, for example).
Instead they would contribute to a decentralized, in how it is
controlled, by strings from elected representatives from all over the world,
weak world government responsible for global
policing, international space program, global standards
negotiation, and maybe a few other things but with
most duties left to the still existing national, first nations, provincial/state/territory
and municipal governments. The world government
global policing force
when not needed for policing could do environmental
and humanitarian work. This would save all the
countries trillions of US dollars, collectively and
over time. Some of that could go to an international
space program, other to environmental and humanitarian work.
Also arms dealing to anyone other than official police forces
and hunters should be banned. Also there should be a global
monetary unit and global budget balancing.
-
some sex related notes:
-
no discrimination against born-with divinely-given/created (for any of
you who believe in a Creator)
loving compatible consensual same sex or other
loving compatible consensual sexuality.
Exceptions are rape and sex by adults with children (though
near age consensual compatible teen safe sex or near age consensual
compatible adult with pre-adult near-adult teen, e.g.
adult 19 and pre-adult 17, safe sex is OK) and incest and sex with animals.
If you are straight be straight but let
gays be gay, and they will let you be straight, of course.
-
no discrimination against those who choose a celibate lifestyle as long as
that sexual repression does not lead to child abuse. But I believe
e.g. if the Catholic church allowed marriage of priests,
and gay marriage, and masturbation they
would quickly solve their priest shortage and
child abuse problem.
-
allowance of committed polyamoric relationships,
for example threesomes
-
I tend to lean to some sort of
commitment/connection before sex but not necessarily
marriage before sex or immediately after first sex.
-
abortion should be allowed on choice by the pregnant
woman up to the end of the first trimester, or later
if the woman's life is in danger. (That is assuming
the infrastructure is in place to allow a speedy
abortion in that first trimester.) But there should
be no abortion for the purpose of child sex
selection, which has discriminated against girl
fetuses in some cultures.
-
It is
time we globally dropped (and made illegal where they are not)
old military and/or religious
pronouncements which I think were
designed to increase population for military
purposes or religious path strength; we now have a population
of over 7.5 billion. (But note that I would push for
dropping of such pronouncements even if global population was
much lower and they should be dropped in sparsely
populated rural areas as well as cities.)
Such pronouncements include
those
-
against loving compatible adult same sex relationships, including same
sex marriage and all governments with gays and lesbians
among their citizens and
religions that have gays and lesbians
among their members would be criminally (and I hope
legally soon where they are not) negligent in not
conducting marriages for them, since such marriages
reduce infidelity and promiscuity and sexually transmitted
disease and death. If you are straight
be straight, but let gays be gay, don't bully them
-
against masturbation . Masturbation is important in that
it can help teens delay sexual activity (and result
in fewer teen pregnancies and fewer needed abortions)
and can help
prospective rapists including pedophiles, including
some ordained ones, release
their tension without committing a crime. Also
in masturbating while thinking of prospective
partners the maximum orgasms should occur when there is
strong compatibility, and said strong compatability is
a key to lifelong relationships. Hence masturbation
is a tool for determining who you should court.
(Aside: Onan's fault was in not impregnating his
dead brother's wife, and hence failing his then
family duty, not because of the masturbation,
i.e., not any masturbation would have been the
crime, but just that one of avoiding his then
family duty.)
-
against birth control before
marriage (and for family planning after marriage; and
condoms for protection against HIV and other STDs).
-
against committed marriage
groups of more than two. Now some may say that
polyamorists often have a lot of children but this
is more true in sparsely populated rural areas than
in cities, and also there would be in time
just as many groups with one woman and two men
as with one man and two women. Overall it
would result in fewer children per parent
and one could be at home while two work. But
of course many would still choose marriage
groups of two.
-
against education of girls and
women, and employment, in all fields
including political office, of women
-
for forced marriage
especially forced early marriage.
-
But I am against sex where
there is not love and lust BOTH ways.
-
Also, though it may have no effect on population, there should
be allowance of divorce of unloving marriages, including
e.g. divorce by priest of an abusive and/or incompatible marriage.
-
no environmental abuse (or at least strive towards that)
-
no abuse of other species (ideally be at least above neutral to other species as a whole
species and strive to be so to individual members of other species,
though we would still give some edge to our own species)
-
strive to love (be at least above neutral) to all members of our
own species, but loving non-loving
individuals may include curing them rather than just turning
the other cheek in all cases, but ideally methods other
than war can be used for
persuasion/healing/transformation/mediation/negotiation
-
no intolerance of other paths that meet this
minimum standard, and that
there are many paths up the moral mountain and that
someone else in another loving path won't suffer for eternity
for not being in your path. In this message I
include atheism as a path, i.e. the term path includes
spiritual paths (including individual belief systems)
and atheism.
-
no enforced enrolment in a path but only enrolment after an
educated choice
-
individual responsibility to be a seed of good
which means you have to
grow the love inside you and spread it around (instigate
others to be loving but without cult conditioning, they
must think for themselves and in many cases the student
will then surpass the teacher), as many
already do. This should not involve proselytising
of theories without evidence, though they can be
shared without pressure.
-
I would lobby for recognition of similarities in my life and the lives of
SOME past major pagan and major non-pagan religious figures and probably
in their messages though I haven't delved quite as much into that
yet but intend to gradually, part time, over the rest of my life.
Of course such figures are not carbon copies and there are
also differences.
-
I am against the Hindu caste system and similar systems if any.
-
The rights of those with a long (and continuous
during that length, though note the stuff on
displacement below) ancestral connection to
the land must be respected particularly if they are
good stewards of that land, and this perhaps applies
most to native people who as a people have been living on the
land (not necessarily with dwellings in always exactly
the same spot, sometimes they were and maybe still
are nomadic to some extent within that territory,
or just have hunted, fished and trapped in that territory)
for 300 years or more. Any who have been or who are in the future
(hopefully none in the future) displaced from their
territory after holding
it in permanent settlement within the region [not necessarily
houses or other dwellings in the exact same place]
for 300 years or more should get such respect
with regard to management of the land and return
of the land to their control if feasible and if
not some form of compensation if none has already
been given to them.
But immigrants
who are respectful of the land and can be in harmony
with the native peoples also have some rights but
I hope native peoples will be consulted a bit more
regarding immigration and however that immigration
will not always be just to the megacities, in Canada
(and that may apply elsewhere as well). Also of
course some native nations are technically sovereign
and in partnership with Canada though they may be
on the geographic area most in the world still
know as Canada, but eventually should have their
own representation at the UN or in world government
should the UN evolve to a weak world government [one
more level on top of municipal, state/province,
national (including native nations) with division
of duties]. I suggest there could be one native
umbrella council (so in North America that could be
a combination meeting of the US region Council of Grand Chiefs and
the Canadian region Assembly of First Nations)
for each continent that has aboriginals (which generally
implies displaced individuals so I don't think blacks
in Africa are considered aboriginals)
that would
send a representative to world government and report
bck to all the native nations on that continent, but
that may depend a bit on population and the number
of representatives globally to the world government.
There should also be a Romany representative to such
a world government.
-
a ban on war and a ban on arms sales to anyone other than official police forces and hunters
-
an end to child abuse and spousal abuse
However I am not lobbying for anyone to accept
my eight main deities, and I don't want anyone to
worship me.